TrigGuard
TRIGGUARD
Request access

Pricing

Commercial governance for automated execution

Pricing aligns to deployment risk, governance scope, and assurance depth, not generic seat count. Start with the highest-consequence execution surfaces, then expand as controls mature.

Procurement follows irreversible execution risk.

  • For critical infrastructureBuilt for regulated high-assurance environments.
  • Deterministic by designFail-closed enforcement with cryptographic receipts.
  • Scale with maturityExpand coverage, assurance, and integrations over time.
Request a demo Talk to engineering Critical infrastructure

Authorization must exist where execution occurs. Procurement follows deployment risk, not seat volume.

How pricing works

Commercial shape is determined by control architecture, not headcount.

Execution surfaces

APIs, tools, payments, data export, infrastructure operations, and OT actions governed.

Deployment model

Inline gateway, sidecar service, policy-engine integration, dedicated or sovereign clusters.

Assurance level

Receipt depth, verification controls, audit integrations, support, and SLA profile.

Verification scope

Receipt retention windows, API verification access, and evidence expectations.

Runtime control determines operational trust.

Receipts determine evidence posture.

Deployment model determines procurement path.

Execution governance topology diagram showing permit, deny, and silence runtime outcomes from the deterministic decision core.

Runtime governance topology

Authorization posture must be visible before procurement qualification

This layer defines how enforcement, evidence, and deployment boundaries are evaluated across high-consequence execution surfaces.

  • Inline authorization at irreversible execution paths
  • Cryptographic receipt chain for audit-grade evidence
  • Sovereign, dedicated, and air-gapped deployment options

Execution surfaces differ. Enforcement requirements do not. Teams progress by operational maturity.

Deployment maturity stages

Buy for the stage you operate today, then progress through stricter enforcement and assurance obligations.

Stage 1 · Evaluation

Evaluation

Initial qualification for scoped non-critical execution paths.

  • Hosted gateway evaluation access (approval)
  • SDK and controlled local integration path
  • Basic execution receipts
  • Single-environment governance baseline
Start evaluation
Stage 2 · Production enforcement

Production enforcement

Deterministic authorization for live irreversible execution paths.

  • Deterministic authorization engine
  • Fail-closed execution control
  • Policy enforcement across surfaces
  • Cryptographic decision receipts
  • CI/CD and runtime integration support
Qualify production rollout
Stage 3 · Regulated deployment

Regulated deployment

Compliance-heavy and sovereign operating footprints.

  • Multi-environment policy deployment
  • Advanced receipt verification
  • Dedicated support path
  • Audit and compliance integrations
  • Custom SLA options
Map regulated rollout
Stage 4 · Critical infrastructure

Critical infrastructure

Dedicated procurement path for regulated OT, defence, transport, and air-gapped environments.

  • Sovereign and air-gapped patterns
  • Higher-assurance operational support
  • Regulatory mapping and integration
  • Dedicated solutions engineering
Start procurement process

Policies without enforcement are observability. Runtime control and receipts create operational trust.

Capability comparison

Use this matrix to qualify enforcement readiness and assurance depth by operational stage.

Capability Dev / Starter Production Enterprise Crit. infra
Governance controls
Pre-execution authorization Yes Yes Yes Yes
Deterministic authorization - Yes Yes Yes
Fail-closed control - Yes Yes Yes
Policy enforcement engine Yes Yes Yes Yes
Verification and evidence
Cryptographic receipts Yes Yes Yes Yes
Verification API Yes Yes Yes Yes
Deployment scope
Multiple execution surfaces - Yes Yes Yes
CI/CD enforcement - Yes Yes Yes
Runtime integrations Limited Yes Yes Yes
Sovereign deployment - - Yes Yes
Air-gapped patterns - - Optional Yes
Support and compliance
Compliance support - Yes Yes Yes
Dedicated support - Yes Yes Yes
Custom SLAs - Optional Yes Yes

On smaller screens, secondary comparison rows are collapsed to prioritize procurement-critical controls.

Runtime verification flow

Live procurement qualification signals that procurement, engineering, and risk teams evaluate together.

  1. Surface declaredExecution boundary and deployment footprint mapped.
  2. Policy evaluatedDeterministic rules and context enforced pre-execution.
  3. Receipt signedDecision evidence retained for verification and audit.
  4. Posture verifiedAPI and controls validated for procurement sign-off.

Open implementation and FAQ resources ->

Ready to qualify your production enforcement posture?

Work directly with TrigGuard engineering and solutions teams to map runtime governance controls, assurance requirements, and procurement path for your operating environment.

Start procurement conversation Book engineering qualification Request critical infrastructure path