Problem & risk
Operators face converged IT/OT threats, ageing infrastructure, and rising automation. AI that proposes switching actions, setpoints, or work orders needs the same discipline as safety interlocks: deterministic authorization before actuation, with evidence for regulators and internal audit.
Request a grid or OT workshop to map your control points.
Regulatory context
Expectations from NIS2, sector-specific resilience regimes, and AI governance guidance converge on demonstrable control of automated decisions affecting critical services.1
- Map to Ofgem resilience and reporting requirements, EU AI Act where applicable, and your national cyber/OT security frameworks.
Solution
TrigGuard is the gate between inference and action: policy evaluates each proposed operation; DENY and SILENCE prevent harmful execution; PERMIT proceeds with signed receipts for post-incident review and compliance packs.
- Sub-second evaluation for operational loops
- Clear audit trail for safety and compliance cases
- Policies aligned to site-specific risk appetite
Integration points
Integration points include EMS/SCADA-adjacent orchestration layers, DER aggregation platforms, outage management, work order systems, and predictive maintenance pipelines before tickets become field actions.
Execution surfaces in energy & utilities
Buyer queries cluster on dispatch, OT-adjacent control, and market automation, not on "AI for utilities" alone. Name the actuation paths, then wire each to the governance cluster.
- Grid dispatch and balancing automation Algorithms that propose switching, reserves, or curtailment can affect reliability at scale. Use Fail-closed AI systems so unsafe or unapproved actions never reach the control path.
- DER and market operations Aggregation and bidding loops need deterministic outcomes under known policy. Deterministic authorization keeps decisions aligned to published rules and versions.
- OT and remote operations Work orders, setpoints, and remote interventions are execution events. Gate them with Pre-execution authorization before devices or field crews are instructed.
- Outage and emergency workflows Accelerated response must still respect safety interlocks and procedure. Policy enforcement engine encodes who may act and under which contingencies.
- Predictive maintenance to field action When models promote tickets into work that changes plant state, treat the handoff as agentic. AI agent safety bounds tools and escalation.
- Cyber-physical automation at the edge Local autonomy should assume loss of cloud context. Pair fail-closed behaviour with AI decision verification for post-event evidence.
Next steps
Choose how you want to engage, each action logs intent for follow-up when analytics is enabled.
Related reading & programme notes
- Why AI in grid operations needs a safety interlock
- Navigating the EU AI Act for energy operators
- From predictive maintenance to autonomous switching: governance
Long-form articles on the content calendar can deep-link here as they ship.