Problem & risk
Teams invest in evals, red-teaming, and dashboards, yet agents still reach tools and APIs with insufficient runtime policy. The gap is architectural: you need a single enforcement point with deterministic semantics and cryptographic receipts.
Regulatory context
Regulators and customers increasingly ask not “which model?” but “what prevents harmful execution?”, evidence must tie controls to live systems.1
- See your sector pages for regime-specific mapping: banking, energy, industrial.
Solution
TrigGuard implements PERMIT, DENY, and SILENCE with policy-as-code, fail-closed defaults, and signed outcomes suitable for audit. It complements observability, it does not replace it.
- Authorization layer in front of tools and surfaces
- Consistent semantics across agents and services
- Integration with IAM, policy repos, and CI/CD
Integration points
Deploy adjacent to API gateways, service meshes, agent frameworks, and OT/industrial gateways, wherever irreversible actions originate.
Next steps
Choose how you want to engage, each action logs intent for follow-up when analytics is enabled.
Related reading & programme notes
- Latency, placement, and the execution gateway
- PERMIT · DENY · SILENCE decision model
- Execution authorization category overview
Long-form articles on the content calendar can deep-link here as they ship.